Today's the day the Christian church remembers Christ's entrance into Jerusalem, the week before He was crucified by the Romans and rose again from the grave. His entrance into the city was marked by excitement, rejoicing, and (wait for it...) people waving palm branches (
I remember past Palm Sundays in several churches, watching palm-branch-bearing children parade up and down the sanctuary aisles, while proud parents beamed from their pews, and music and songs rose up from the music team. All in all, they were somewhat emotionally-overcharged services (
The situation in Jerusalem, however, is pretty hard to understand. During the Triumphal Entry (Palm Sunday), the crowds were ecstatic. They were energetic, excited, and generally overjoyed to welcome Jesus into their city. He entered the gates riding a donkey while they shouted praises (Mark 11).
Less than a week later, they chose a known murderer and insurrectionist over Christ, while shouting "Crucify Him!" (Mark 15). He was sentenced to death by the Romans in accordance with their collective will.
Why the difference?
From what I've learned in my short (and quite inadequate) studies, the nation of Israel (in Christ's day) were not looking for a Savior Who, in sacrificing Himself, would pay the penalty for the sins of God's chosen people. They were awaiting a conquering Messiah who would take his place on David's throne, cast out their Roman invaders, and set Israel in their rightful place. They wanted glorification for their nation-state, and freedom from the Roman government. Christ's entry into Jerusalem sparked off this "revolutionary" mentality. The people were, I believe, looking to Jesus as this Messiah, and their reaction, though ignorant, was based on a self-serving and inadequate understanding of His purpose.
So...with this in mind, why do churches have children parading up and down the aisles on this Sunday, waving palm branches in a [potentially] misguided remembrance of sinful ignorance? Is this a correct observance and remembrance of Christ fulfilling prophecy foretold hundreds of years before? Should we not, perhaps, spend this Sunday reflecting on how we, as fallen human beings, will try to change Christ's purpose into something other than the incredible, and most amazing gift we could ever be given? The nation of Israel wanted Him to free them from the Romans; He was sent to free us from our sin and bridge the chasm between us and the Holy Lord. Their purposes and the Will of the Lord were at odds, and it behoves us to remember this and reflect upon Who Christ IS, and not Who we want Him to be.
Edit: My good buddy Kyle brought up a few good points to consider. Here are some passages to think through as I further ponder the discussion (emphasis mine, obviously):
Luke 19:41-44: 'And when he drew near and saw the city, he wept over it, saying, "Would that you, even you, had known on this day the things that make for peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes. For the days will come upon you, when your enemies will set up a barricade around you and surround you and hem you in on every side and tear you down to the ground, you and your children within you. And they will not leave one stone upon another in you, because you did not know the time of your visitation."'
This would, if nothing else, support the idea that the masses were praising out of expectation of something other than the truth. But...(again, emphasis mine)...
I think the primary concern I have is the re-enactment itself. I'm not questioning the act of worship itself, but rather the context in which it is taking place. We worship in truth because God has revealed it to us. They worshipped in ignorance because God had not yet revealed it to them.
Of course, I could be making a lot of nothing, and I certainly don't condemn those churches in the past... :-)
Luke 19:37-40: As he was drawing near—already on the way down the Mount of Olives—the whole multitude of his disciples began to rejoice and praise God with a loud voice for all the mighty works that they had seen, saying, "Blessed is the King who comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven and glory in the highest!" And some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to him, "Teacher, rebuke your disciples." He answered, "I tell you, if these were silent, the very stones would cry out."It seems, even though they were praising out of ignorance, they were still praising. This is certainly something to consider, and perhaps have a level of understanding for them. Heck, even the disciples didn't understand why Christ had come. They were likewise expecting Him to take His place on the throne of Israel as their conquering Messiah. But...
I think the primary concern I have is the re-enactment itself. I'm not questioning the act of worship itself, but rather the context in which it is taking place. We worship in truth because God has revealed it to us. They worshipped in ignorance because God had not yet revealed it to them.
Of course, I could be making a lot of nothing, and I certainly don't condemn those churches in the past... :-)
4 comments:
Hey, I lost track of your blog a while back, but I'm always ready to respond to theology!
1) That's a kinda sad thought. I wonder if Jesus weeps over our churches while the kids walk down the aisle saying "hosanna."
2) I don't think it was the same crowd that cheered him as condemned him. The Pharisees were complaining at the triumphal entry and they condemned him later. I get the idea that the crowds that cheered him were "ignorant" common people who were quiet at the end of the week because Jesus wasn't acting like they thought he did. I'm sure there were some who praised his entrance and later demanded death, but I get the idea they were generally different crowds.
Re: #1: I can't tell if you're being sarcastic ;-) My concern isn't having children walk down the aisle proclaiming "hosanna!". By all means!! But I'm not necessarily comfortable with having them re-enact what _seems_ to be (allowing myself some wiggle room) a display of ignorance and self-interest.
Re #2: I hadn't considered they were separate crowds, though it seems the crowd was certainly mixed (as you mentioned, there were Pharisees present as well) and ignorant (see updated post).
Thanks Kyle -- it's always great to hear from you!
I wasn't trying to be sarcastic in my first comment. I was just imagining the irony of a church who was misunderstanding Jesus in whatever manner (like a "Jesus hates my political enemies" type church) and having Jesus weep over the church while the children went mimicking the crowds reaction shortly before Jesus got crucified.
As for the crowd. They understood he was the Messiah and for that their praise was valid, though I get the impression that Jesus was the only person that had any idea of what was coming.
Lol, you mean God doesn't hate those who disagree with me politically??
I'm not sure if the crowds on Sunday thought Jesus was the Messiah as much as He was a Messiah...Probably, to some extent, it's really just conjecture. But I wonder about Jesus' words. He's speaking of the future Roman destruction of Jerusalem, and the pending Diaspora. The destruction of Israel (according to the Amillenialists :) was evidence of their final rejection (as a nation) of the Messiah, and their final judgement (as a nation) by the Lord...
Post a Comment